<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[How Do You Handle Scope Creep with Clients?]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">Scope creep is probably the number one challenge FDEs face.</p>
<h3>Common Scenarios</h3>
<ul>
<li>Client asks for one more feature that turns into a month of work</li>
<li>Stakeholders have conflicting priorities</li>
<li>The original project scope keeps expanding</li>
</ul>
<h3>Strategies That Work</h3>
<ol>
<li><strong>Document everything</strong> - Written scope agreements protect everyone</li>
<li><strong>Say yes, then prioritize</strong> - We can do that, let us figure out where it fits</li>
<li><strong>Make trade-offs visible</strong> - If we add X, we push Y. Which matters more?</li>
<li><strong>Regular check-ins with your manager</strong> - They can push back at a higher level</li>
<li><strong>Time-box exploration</strong> - Let me spend 2 hours looking into feasibility</li>
</ol>
<p dir="auto"><strong>What are your strategies for managing scope?</strong></p>
]]></description><link>https://fde.today/topic/4/how-do-you-handle-scope-creep-with-clients</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 07:36:09 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://fde.today/topic/4.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 22:03:54 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>